The Strategies of the land use in Border Regions Based on the SWOT-AHP and SWOT-ANP Models Case Study (Sistan and Baluchistan) AboollFazl Ghanbari 1*, Ayoub Sardari2, Arash

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Geography, University of Tabriz, Ira

2 MSc. Faculty of Geography, University of Tabriz, Iran

3 MSc. Faculty of Geography, University of Tabriz, Ira

4 MSc .Town and country Planning, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to represent the strategies and approaches to develop the border areas of Sistan and Baluchistan Province. The research method was descriptive-analytic. Furthermore, the study was an applied research, documentary and field studies were the methods of data collection, and the research was performed in the form of questionnaire. The validity of it was reviewed and confirmed by 20 experts (experts in urban and rural planning, and land use). The model used in this research was a hybrid model of SWOT-ANP and SWOT- AHP. Thus, the capabilities and limitations of the land use of border areas were measured. In terms of development, has been made. To reach this goal, by using the technique of SWOT, the strengths and weaknesses (internal factors), and the opportunities and threats (external factors) were identified. By the use of ANP and AHP models, the external and internal factors were examined to adopt the best strategy (SO, WO, ST, and WT). The findings indicated that in the SWOT-ANP model, the SO strategy with the score weight of 0.28152, and the ST strategy with the score weight of 0.26573 were chosen as the most important strategy, and as the alternative strategy, respectively. Moreover, in the SWOT- AHP model, the ST strategy with the score weight of 0.705, and WO strategy with the score weight of 0.601 were chosen as the most important strategy, and as the alternative strategy, respectively.

Keywords


 
- عندلیب، علیرضا؛ معطوف، شریف (۱۳۸۸). «توسعه و امنیت در آمایش مناطق مرزی ایران». باغ نظر، شمارة دوازدهم، صفحات ۶۷- ۵۷.
- عندلیب، علیرضا (1380). نظریة پایه و اصول آمایش مناطق مرزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تهران، دانشکدة فرماندهی و ستاد سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی.
- قنبری، حکیمه؛ روستایی، شهریور (۱۳۹۲). «بررسی اولویت­های برنامه­ریزی و آمایش مناطق مرزی استان آذربایجان­ شرقی با به‌­کارگیری مدل تحلیل شبکه (ANP)». آمایش سرزمین، شمارة دوم، صفحات ۳35-۳60.
- نتایج سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن (1385) .
- موسوی، میرنجف (۱۳۸۸).تحلیل کارکرد مرز بر ساختار فضایی شهر­های مرزی (نمونة موردی: استان آذربایجان غربی). پایان‌نامة دکترای رشتة جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکدة جغرافیا، دانشگاه اصفهان.
-Afrakhteh, Hasan (2006). ”The problems of regional development and border cities: A case study of Zahedan, Iran”. Cities, 23(6), 423–432.
-Copus, Andrew (2001). “From Core-Periphery to Polycentric Development Concept of Spatial and A spatial Perpherality”. European Planning Studies, 9(4), Car fax Publishing.
- Erkut، Gülden; Özgen, Ceren (2003). ”The Economic and Spatial Peripherality of Border Regions in Southeastern Europe“. The 43rd European Congress of the Regional Science Association Jyväskylä, Finland 27th-30th.
- Hansen, Niles (1975). “An Evaluation of Growth Center Theory and Practice”. Environment and Planning, No7.
- Jones, Phillip N.; Wild, Trevor (1994).Opening the Frontier: Recent Spatial Impacts in the  Former Inner-German Border Zone“. Regional Studies, 28(3). 259-273.
- Kajanusa, Miika; Kangas, Jyrki; Kurttila, Mikko )2004). ”The use of value focused thinking and the, SWOT hybrid method in tourism management“. Torism Management. 25, 499-506.
-Knox, Paul L.; Marston, Sallie A. (1998). Places and Regions in Global Context. Human  Geography, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
-Niebuhr, Annekatrin; Stiller, Silvia(2004). “Integration and Labour Markets in European Border Regions“. Hamburg Institute of International Economic, PP: 284.
-Niebuhr, Annekatrin; Stiller, Silvia (2002). Integration Effects in Border Regions- A survey of Economic theory and Empirical Studies. Hamburgisches welt – wirtschafts - Archive (HwwA) Hamburginstute of international Economics, ISSN, 1608 – 1616.
-Peach, James T.; Richard V., Adkisson (2000). “Nafta and economic activity along the U.S.–Mexico border”. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2), 481–89.
-Pena, Sergio (2005). “Recent development in urban marginality along Mexico’s northern border”. Journal of Habitat International, No29.
-Perkamann, Markus (2003).“Cross-Border Regions in Europe, Significance, and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border Cooperation”. European Urban Regional Studies, 10(2),
-Sermak, Agnieszku Brzosko (2007). “Theoretical Deliberations on Frontier location of Cities”. Bulletin of Geography (Socio-Economic Sires), 7, 73-86.
-Topaloglou, Lefteris and et al (2006). “A Border Regions Typology in the Enlarged European Union”. Journal of Border lands Studies, 20(2).
-Topaloglou, Lefteris; Petrakos, George (2006). ”The new economic geography of the northern Greek border regions“. 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, 23-27.
- Van Houtum, Henk (2000). “An Overview of European Geographical Research on Border Region“, Journal of Borderlands Studies, xv(1).
-Walters, William (2006). »Border/ Control«. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2),
- Wickramasinghe, Vasantha; Takano, Shin-ei (2009). “Application of combined SWOT and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for tourism revival strategic marketing planning: A Case of Sri Lanka tourism’. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 954-969.
-Yüksel, İhsan; Dağdeviren, Matin. (2007). ”Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-A case study for a textile firm“. Information Sciences,177(16), 3364-3382.
-Gallego-Ayala, Jordi; Juízo, Dinis (2011). “Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: An A’WOT analysis“. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 1103-1111.
-Janparvar, Mohsen; Hosseinpour Motlagh, Mahdi; Mehro, Ali(2014). ”Border Management; as Strategy of States to Maintain Order and Security in the Country”. Geopolitics Quarterly, 9(4), 58-82[m1] .