Spatial Optimization Using Goal Programming, Game Theory and GIS

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc., Faculty of Fisheries and Environment Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environment Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

Abstract

The present study aims to provide a solution to optimize land use through multi-objective linear programming, and to solve the conflicts generated in the process using game theory, in two cities of Gorgan and Kurdkoy, Iran. The primary land use planning was completed for seven land use through multi-criteria evaluation and then a first allocation was implanted using MOLA. In the secondary land use planning phase, land use optimization, with multi-objective linear programming was conducted considering economic-social and environmental needs. Environmental requirments such as reducing runoff, non-point nitrogen pollution and soil erosion, were modeled using L-THIA and RUSLE models. For socio-economic parameters job, profit and initial costs were considered. To finalize, a multi-objective linear programming model, was designed. The environmental and socio-economic stakeholders have different needs. That creates conflict in the land use planning process. In the final third phase of the land use planning, game theory was used to resolve conflicts. Environmental and socio-economic players were allowed to play scenarios in triplicate. The results showed the winning changes in land use to the extent that an equilibrium between interest groups was reached.
 
 
 

Keywords

References

  1. اوجی، محمدرحیم، نیک‌کامی، داوود، مهدیان، محمدحسین و محمودی، شهلا (1392). کمینه‌سازی رواناب و رسوب‌دهی به کمک بهینه‌سازی کاربری اراضی (مطالعة موردی: حوزة آبخیز جاجرود). نشریة پژوهش‌های حفاظت آب و خاک، دورة 20، شمارة 4، صفحات 199-183.
  2. دیلم، مینا (1393). امکان‌سنجی کاربرد نظریة بازی‌ها در حل مسئلة تغییر کاربری اراضی آبخیز زیارت گرگان. پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکدة مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان.
  3. ذوقی، محمود، صفایی، امیر و ملک­محمدی، بهرام (1393). رهنمودهای تئوری بازی در تحلیل مناقشة تغییر کاربری اراضی (مطالعة موردی: اراضی محلة دارآباد تهران). پژوهش­های جغرافیای برنامه­ریزی شهری، دورة 2، شمارة 3، صفحات 407-391.
  4. سلمان‌ماهینی، عبدالرسول، سعدالدین، امیر، جولایی، رامتین، محبوبی، محمدرضا و خوشفر، غلام­رضا (1394). طرح آمایش استان گلستان تحلیل اقتصادی. استانداری گلستان،
  5. ایستمن، ج. رونالد (1390). سنجش‌ازدور و سامانه‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی کاربردی با نرم‌افزار ایدریسی. ترجمة عبدالرسول سلمان‌ماهینی و حمیدرضا کامیاب، تهران: انتشارات مهر مهدیس.
  6. عبدلی، قهرمان (1391). نظریة ‌بازی‌ها و کاربردهای آن (بازی‌های اطلاعات ناقص، تکاملی و همکارانه). تهران: انتشارات سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت)، مرکز تحقیق و توسعة علوم انسانی.
  7. Alexander, C. (1965). A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum, 122(1), 58–61.
  8. Byrne, D. (2003). Complexity theory and planning theory: a necessary encounter. Planning Theory, 2(3), 171–178.
  9. Cai, X., McKinney, D.C. & Lasdon, L. (2003). An integrated hydrologic-agronomic- economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129, 4-17.
  10. De Roo, G. (2004). Coping with the growing complexity of our physical environment: the search for new planning tools in the Netherlands. In: Sorensen, S. Marcotullio, P.J. Grant, J. (Eds.), Towards Sustainable Cities; East Asian, North American and European Perspectives on Managing Urban Regions, Urban Planning and Environment, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 161–175.
  11. Eldrandaly, Kh. )2010(. A GEP-based spatial decision support system for multisite land use allocation. Applied Soft Computing, 10, 694-702.

 

  1. Karmperis, A.C., Aravossis, K., Tatsiopoulos, I.L. & Sotirchos, A. )2013(. Decision support models for solid waste management: Review and game-theoretic approaches. Waste Management, 33, 1290-1301.
  2. Kerachian, R. Fallahnia, M. Bazargan-Lari, M.R. Mansoori, A. & SEDGHI, h. )2010(. A fuzzy game theoretic approach for groundwater resources management, application of Rubinstein Bargaining Theory. Journal of Resources Conservation and Recycling, 54, 673-682.
  3. Lee, C.S. & Chang, S.P. )2005(. International fuzzy optimization for an economics an environmental balance in a river system. Jornal of Water Research, 39, 221-231.
  4. Lee, C.S., Ynge, C.Y., Chang, S.P. & Lee. Y.C. )2010(. Sustainable watershed management by fuzzy game optimization International Environment Modeling and Software Society (iEMSs). International Congress on Environment Modeling and Software Modeling Environment's Sake, Fifth Biennial Meeting Ottawa, Canada David A. Swayne, Wanhong Yang, A. A. Voinov, A. Rizzoli, T. Filatova (EDs).
  5. Lund, J.R. & Palmer, R.N. )1997(. Water resource system modeling for conflict resolution. Journal of Water Resources Update, 3(108), 70-82.
  6. Mohammadi Limaei, S. )2010(. Mixed strategy game theory, application in forest industry. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 527-531.
  7. Ramakrishna, N. )2003(. Production system planning for natural resource conservation in a micro watershed. Electronic Green Journal, 18, 1-10.
  8. Samsura, D., Ary A., Van der krabben, E. & Van Deemen, A.M.A. )2010(. A game theory approach to the analysis of land and propertydevelopment processes. Land Use Policy, 27, 564–578.
  9. Shabani, M. )2010(. Effect of optimizing land use on eroion and benefit of watershed: the case study of Zakhard watershed in Fars province. Iran. J. Natur. Geog, 8, 83-98.
  10. Wang, S.H., Huang, S.L. & Budd, W.W. )2012(. Integrated ecosystem model for simulating land use allocation. Ecological Modelling, 227, 46–55.
  11. Wei, S., Yang, H., Abbaspour, K., Mousavi, J. & Gnauck, A. )2010(. Game theory based models to analyse water conflicts in the Middle Route of the Sourth-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Journal of Water Research, 44, 2499-2516.
Town and Country Planning
Volume 8, Issue 2
Autumn& Winter
October 2016
Pages 203-228

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 August 2016
  • Revise Date: 10 January 2017
  • Accept Date: 04 December 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics