The Typology of the Spatial Pattern and the Suggestion the Possible Future Scenarios of Possible Urban Systems for the Development of Future Urban System of Alborz Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 MSc. Holder, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Population distribution, economic functions, as well as the status and role of cities in the urban system change and evolve through their interaction with other cities over time. This change in the organization of the urban system is not a static one,   but rather it is a context-dependent issue. Alborz province has experienced highly rapid changes in the urban system that have led to the emergence of severe imbalances in the urban system, increasing population and functional concentration in its metropolitan area compared to other cities and the marginalization of other cities of the province in the urban system. The typology of urban system in Alborz province that aims at describing the spatial pattern in which the cities of this urban system are organized and proposing the possible scenarios for the future spatial pattern of this urban system are the subjects of this article. This issue has been pursued through the analysis of the morphological and functional spatial pattern of cities, the analysis of the grounds affecting the formation of the urban system, and for the examination of the possible futures for the urban system. This research had mainly a descriptive nature, relied on quantitative methods and spatial analyses, and emphasized both morphological and functional aspects. According to the findings, the main east-west corridor of the province is the most important factors in the spatial pattern of this province’s urban system. The urban system of the province might develop in future through three possible spatial scenarios. These scenarios include the corridor, polycentric, and monocentric development patterns. It seems that in the urban system of Alborz province despite the spatial concentration of the population and the majority of the provincial functions in Karaj metropolis, there are potentials for the realization of a more balanced development. The potential and tendency to the corridor development model around the east-west axis, which agrees with the natural, infrastructural, and economic structure of the region, is one of these tendencies that can create a demographic and functional balance in the urban system of the province and lead its cities to take various economic roles.

Keywords

Main Subjects


AbouKorin, A. (2017). “Spatial analysis of the urban system in the Nile Valley of Egypt”, Science Direct, pp. 1-11
Batten, D. F. (1995). “Network Cities: Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century”, Urban Studies, pp. 313-327.
Berry, B. (1964). “Cities as systems within systems of cities”, Regional science association international, pp. 147-163.
Bretagnolle, A., Pumain, D., & Vacchiani-Marcuzzo (2010). “The organisation of urban systems”, Complexity perspective in innovation and social change, pp. 197-220.
Brummell, A. & MacGillivray, G. (2016). “Introduction to scenarios”, Netherland: Shell International Petroleum Company.
Burger, M. & Meijers, E. (2011). “Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity”, Urban studies, pp. 1127-1149.
Burger, M. J., Van Oort, F. G., Goei, B. D., & Kitson, M. (2010). “Functional Polycentrism and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East”, United Kingdom: Evidence from Commuting Patterns, pp. 1981–2001. Regional Studies, 1149-1170.
Camagni, R. & Salone, C. (1993). “Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: Elements for a Theoretical Framework”, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1053-1064.
Castells, M. (1990). The Informational City: Information Technology,Economic Restructuring, and the Urban Regional Process, Oxford: Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, Malden: Blackwell.
Champion, A. G. (2001). “A Changing Demographic Regime and Evolving Polycentric Urban Regions: Consequences for the Size, Composition and Distribution of City Populations”, Urban Studies, pp. 657–677.
Dzumbira, W., Geyer Jr, H., & Geyer, H. (2017). “Measuring the spatial economic impact of the Maputo Development Corridor”, DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, pp. 2-6.
Field, B. & McGerogor, B. (1997). Forecasting techniques in urban and regional planning, Tehran: Program and Budget Organization. (in Persian)
Hamdan Jamal ( 1970): Shakhṣ_ıyat Miṣr, Egypt’s Character. Cairo: AlNahdhah Publishing House;
Hekmatnia, H. & Mousavi, M. (2006). Application of the model in geography with emphasis on urban and regional planning, Tehran: Azadpeima. (in Persian)
Isabel, G., Thomas, B., & Hannes, T. (2016). “New spatial dimensions of global cityscapes: From reviewing existing concepts to a conceptual spatial approach”, Springer, pp. 355-380.
Lambregts, B. (2006). “Polycentrism: Boon or Barrier to Metropolitan Competitiveness? The Case of the Randstad Holland”, Built Environment, pp. 114-123.
Liu, Y. F. (2019). “Assessing Polycentric Urban Development in Mountainous Cities: The Case of Chongqing Metropolitan Area, China”, Sustainability, pp. 1-15.
Meijers, E. (2005). “Polycentric Urban Regions and the Quest for Synergy: Is a Network of Cities More than the Sum of the Parts”, Urban Studies, pp. 765-781.
Meijers, E. (2007). “From Central Place to Network Model: Theory and Evidence of Paradigm Change”, Economic and Social Geography, Vol. 98 (2), pp. 245-259.
Meijers, E. J. & Berger, M. J. (2009). “Spatial structure and productivity in US metropolitan areas”, Environment and Planning, 42, 1383-1402.
Murel,V.(1982). On the problem of the internal organization of settlement systems. Soviet Geography, 7.
Pacione, M. (2001). Urban geography-a global perspective, London: Routledge, Pajek, Cambridge University.
Parr, J. (2014). The Regional Economy, Spatial Structure and Regional Urban Systems. Regional Studies, 1926-1938.
Rodrigue, J. P. (2013). The Geography of Transport (Third Ed.), London: Taylor & Francis Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Short, J. R., Kim, Y., Kuus, M., Wells, H. (1996). The Dirty Little Secret of World Cities Research: Data Problems in Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, 697–717
Simmons, J. W. & Bourne, L. S. (1981). “Urban and regional systems - qua systems”, Progress in human geography, pp. 420-431.
Simmons, J. W. (1996) Systems of Cities: Reading on Structure, Growth, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 61–69,.
Taylor, P. H. (2010). External Urban Relational Process: Introducing Central Flow Theory to Complement Central Place Theory, Urban Studies, 47.
The World Bank (1991). Urban Policy and Economic Development an Agenda for the 1990s, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Van Der Laan (1998). “Changing urban systems: an empirical analysis at two spatial levels”, Regional Studies, 32, pp. 235-247.
Wuyang, Y. (1987). On urban systems, Geographical Research, pp 3
www.googleearth.com (15-5-99)
www.maphil.com (15-5-99)
Zebardast, E. & Shahabi Shahiri, M. (2014). “Analysis of covalent development capability in multicenter urban areas Case study: Central Mazandaran urban region (Amol, Babol, Qaemshahr, Sari)”, Regional Planning Quarterly, pp. 33-48. (in Persian)
Zhang, Wu. & Rui (2001). Evolution of urban system in new economic circumstance and planning countermeasures, Chinese geographical science, 129.
Volume 12, Issue 2
Autumn @ Winter
October 2020
Pages 359-384
  • Receive Date: 07 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 November 2020