An Analysis of the Continuity and Cohesion of Urban Ecologic Network Through a Graph Theory Model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 PhD of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Nowadays, problems related to the environment, society, and identity of cities derives from their expansion and the increasing penetration of natural space by human-made space. Green spaces are deemed not only as a green patch at the disposal of the masses, but also as a factor for the improvement of citizens’ life. On the other hand, the destruction and removal of homogeneity and continuity of natural infrastructures and green networks threatens the biological diversity and brings about limitations for development. Therefore, continuity of the urban green spaces provides habitats and corridors that help the preservation of biological diversity. To develop green space networks, increase continuity, and revive biological diversity, urban planners have used landscape ecology principles. Adopting a descriptive-analytical method and review of the scientific resources, this study investigated landscape connections and their importance for the preservation of biological diversity. Maragheh city green space network was modeled in GIS according to Graph theory. Then, the ecologic continuity analysis was carried out through Conefor software along with Integral Continuity (IIC) measure and point picking algorithm, and the urban green patches were valuated. At the end, the potential corridors in Maragheh city were identified using the least cost method, which then developed and improved the green space networks. The results of this study reveal that the majority of the built corridors are located around the city like a green belt. The main reason for this is the positioning of the main habitats in the city outskirts. Moreover, the green space network developed based on Graph theory made the complex landscape simpler and more organized, and helped with the identification of green space and the guidance of urban planning for the protection of biological diversity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ahern, J. (2007). “Green Infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension”, In Cities of the future, Towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management, ed. Novotny, V. London: IWA Publications.
Al-Hashemi, A. (1394). “Landscaping approach to urban infrastructure, Tehran water network development strategies as urban landscaping infrastructure”, PhD thesis in Architecture, Tehran, University of Tehran. (in Persian)
Al-Hashemi, A. & Mojtahedi, B. (2013). “Adaptation and connection of the network of urban landmarks with the natural bed, a step towards the legibility of the city landscape”, Available: http://zibasazi.ir/fa/commentarticle/item/4751- html
Barati, B., Jahani, A., Zebardast, L., & Rayegani, B. (2017). “Integration assessment of the protected areas using landscape ecological approach (Case Study: Kolah Ghazy National Park and Wildlife Refuge)”, Town and country planning, 9(1), pp. 153-168. (in Persian)
Behbehani, H. & Berenji, M. (2010). “Provide continuity between natural and historical structures existed in the urban areas using green design of urban roads”,  3(1), pp. 45-64. (in Persian)
Benedict, M. A. & McMahon, E. T. (2006). Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Bennett, G. (2004). Integrating Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use: Lessons Learned From Ecological Networks, IUCN. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK. 55 pp. Available at: http://data.iucn.org/dbtwwpd/edocs/2004-002.pdf.
Boitani, L., Falcucci, A., Maiorano, L., & Rondinini, C. (2007). “Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation”, Conserv, Biol, 21, pp. 1414-1422.
Bunn, A.G, Urban, D.L., & Keitt, T.H. (2000). “Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory”, Journal of Environmental Management, 59(4), pp. 265-278.
Chicago Metropolitan Agency (2016). integrating green infrastructure: On to 2050 strategy paper. Available from: http://www.cmap.illinois.gov. Accessed 2 November 2016.
Cook, E. A. & Van Lier, H. N. (Eds.). (1994). Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cook, E. A. (2002). “Landscape Structure Indices for assessing urban ecological networks”, Landscape and urban planning, 58, pp. 269-280.
Council of Europe (1996). UNEP, European Center for Natural Conservation, the Pan European Biological & Landscape Diversity Strategy: A Vision for Europe's Natural Heritage.
Dale, M. R. T. & Fortin, M. J. (2010). “From Graph to Spatial Graph, the Annual Review of Ecology”, Evolution and Systematics, 41, pp. 21-38.
Foltête, J. C. (2019). “How ecological networks could benefit from landscape graphs: A response to the paper by Spartaco Gippoliti and Corrado Battisti”, Land Use Policy, 80, pp. 391-394.
Galpern, P., Manseau, M., & Fal, A. (2011). “Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation”, Biological Conservation, 144, pp. 44-55.
Ganjipour, A. (2017). “Per capita green space assessment using GIS Case Study: district 8 of Tehran”, Environmental based territorial planning, 9(35), pp. 71-84. (in Persian)
Hargrove, W. W., Hoffman, F. M., & Efroymson, R. A. (2005). “A practical map-analysis tool for detecting potential dispersal corridors”, Landscape Ecology, 20(4), pp. 361-373.
http://zibasazi.ir/fa/commentarticle/item/4751-html. (in Persian)
Podat, F., Bargh Jaloo, S. D., & Mirkarimi, S.H. (2014). “Analytical review on how to measure ecological cohesion in order to protect biodiversity in cities”, Environmental Research, 5(10), pp. 210-195. (in Persian)
Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling, Landscape and urban planning, 95(1), pp. 16-27.
Karam, A., Hajjeh Foroshnia, S., & Hakimi, H. (2012). “Assessing and analyzing landscape continuity, a new approach in environmental planning Case study: Kashan-Aran area”, Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 1(3), pp. 44-29. (in Persian)
Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & Zong, Y. (2010). Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation
 : 
Kubes, J. (1996). “Biocenters and Corridors in a cultural landscape: A critical assessments of the territorial system of the ecological stability”, landscape urban planning, 35(40), pp. 231-240.
Mokhtari, Z. & Sayyahnia, R. (2017). Principles of studying and quantifying the structure of the land image, Tehran, Avaye Ghalam. (in Persian)
Pascual-Hortal, L. & Saura, S. (2007). “Impact of spatial scale on the identification of critical habitat patches for the maintenance of landscape connectivity”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2-3), pp. 176-186.
Sadegh Oghli, R., Jahani, A., Alizade Shabani, A., & Goshtasb, H. (2019). “Evaluation of Landscape Structure for Development and Integration of the Protected Areas”, town and country planning, 11(1), pp. 57-78. (in Persian)
Sepp, K., Palang, H., Mander, U., & Kaasik, A. (1999). “Prospects for nature and landscape protection in Estonia”, landscape urban planning, 46, pp. 161-167.
Shieh, E. & Moshref Dehkordi, H. (2010). “The roll of Green space continuity in natural identity of urban”, Architechture and urnanism of utopia, 9, pp. 315-321. (in Persian)
SWA group (2012). Landscape infrastructure: Case studies, Basel: Birkhäuser Architecture.
Taylor, P. D. (2006). Landscape connectivity: A return to the basics, Connect. Conserv, pp. 29–43.
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Ka´zmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). “Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), pp. 167–178.
Urban, D. L. (2009). “Graph models of habitat mosaics”, Ecology Letters, 12(3), pp. 260-273.
Varesi, H. R., Mohammadi, J., & Shahivandi, A. (2007). “Urban green space Site selection using geographical information system”, Geography and regional development, 10(6), pp. 83-103. (in Persian)
Xiu, N., Ignatieva, M., Boch, C., Chai, Y., Wang, F., Cui, T., & Yang, F. (2017). “A socio-ecological perspective of urban green networks: The Stockholm case”, Urban Ecosystem, 20, pp. 729-742.
Yu, K. (2012). Ecological infrastructure leads the way: the negative approach and landscape urbanism for smart preservation and smart growth, In Richter, M., Weiland, U. (Eds.), Applied Urban Ecology: A Global Framework. Oxford: Black well Publishing.
Yuhong, T., Jiaomei, L., & Chiyung, J. (2011). Landscape planning of the green network in Tai Po Industrial Estate in Hong Kong, International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring. 19, 20 Feb.2011. Changsha: IEEE.
Zhang, L. & Wang, H. (2006). “Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), pp. 449-456.
Zhang, Z.H., Meroow, S., Newell, J., & Lindquist, M. (2019). “Enhancing Landscape Connectivity through Multifunctional green infrastructure corridor modeling and design”,  38, pp. 305-317.
 
Town and Country Planning
Volume 13, Issue 2
October 2021
Pages 281-309

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 13 December 2020
  • Accept Date: 13 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics